Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:16

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What are some of the greatest marketing disasters in history?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Fed’s Waller sees path to multiple interest-rate cuts this year - MarketWatch
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
'Just one mutation away', COVID-19-like virus in China could spark outbreak: Study - WION
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
US Food and Drug Administration Launches AI Platform to 'Modernize' Agency - Decrypt
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why the end of Google as we know it could be your biggest opportunity yet - ZDNet
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What is the lowest probability event you have personally witnessed?